SC MRA

Freedom Fighters Collaboration Area
Welcome to SC MRA Sign in | Join | Help
in
Home Blogs External News Forums Photos Downloads SCMRA Home

Time for SC to reexamine helmet laws

Last post 08-06-2008, 3:56 AM by BillBrews. 1 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  08-04-2008, 7:23 AM 2687

    Time for SC to reexamine helmet laws

    http://www.timesanddemocrat.com/articles/2008/08/03/opinion/doc4893782c57b7e011420463.txt

    Time for S.C. to re-examine laws on motorcycles Sunday, August 03, 2008 Leave a Comment | Default | Large

    THE ISSUE: Motorcycle laws

    OUR OPINION: S.C. law should require training, use of safety equipment

    The number of motorcycles on the road is likely to continue increasing as people look for gas-saving transportation alternatives. More bikes will mean more deaths.

    It’s already happening. South Carolina is the 14th-worst state in the nation for motorcycle deaths. Motorcycle deaths have increased by 40 percent (from 87 in 2003 to 122 in 2007) in the last five years in South Carolina.

    David E. Parsons, CEO and president of AAA Carolinas, which conducted a survey on motorcycle use and fatalities, said, “Registered motorcycles in the state represent only about 4 percent of registered vehicles but they are involved in 11 percent of all fatal traffic deaths. With an increase in motorcycle sales this year, the number of motorcycle fatalities will undoubtedly rise.”

    With motorcycles becoming a primary mode of transportation, there is a need to re-evaluate how South Carolina law addresses the bikes.

    The present law for motorcycle licenses allows a motorcycle to be legally driven on public streets without the motorcyclist ever having taken a Department of Motor Vehicle road test or a state-approved motorcycle training/education course.

    Instead, the law allows a motorcyclist to receive an annual permit if they just pass a vision and written traffic knowledge test. The 12-month permit can be renewed indefinitely.

    “Motorcyclists should be required to demonstrate their riding ability before being allowed to drive on public roads,” Parsons said. “AAA Carolinas supports a mandate to require all motorcyclists to complete a state-approved course before riding on public roads.”

    As Parsons says, “It just makes sense for the safety of both the motorcyclist and other motorists.”

    As important is wearing a helmet. South Carolina law allows motorcyclists to decide whether or not to wear a helmet. Not wearing a helmet is a major contributor to increased motorcyclists’ fatalities.

    “It is much safer to ride a motorcycle with a helmet. Decreasing the number of motorcycle fatalities in South Carolina is dependent on the state passing a universal helmet law, which AAA Carolinas supports,” Parsons said.

    About 75 percent of South Carolina motorcycle fatalities in the last five years were individuals who did not wear a helmet, according to state motorcycle fatality statistics compiled by the Department of Public Safety.

    The state’s Office of Highway Safety would support a universal helmet law, according to Ed Harmon, assistant director of the office, a division of DPS.

    “We believe that motorcyclists should wear U.S. Department of Transportation-compliant helmets whenever they ride,” Harmon said. “We encourage motorcycle advocacy groups in the state to spread the message that they support the voluntary use of protective equipment such as motorcycle helmets.”

    “The people who are dying in S.C. motorcycle crashes are mainly in the age groups of 35-55, male, and don’t wear a helmet,” Harmon said. “I expect most of those fatalities were individuals who did not take any motorcycle skills training.”

    Lawmakers in Columbia saw fit to rescind the state’s previous helmet law and have steered clear of the wrath of biker organizations by refusing to reinstate it. It’s time to reconsider. Mandatory training and use of safety equipment are necessary as more and more bikers share the road with other vehicles.


    Ride Free, Ride Often
    Bill C.

    "When the people fear the government you have tyranny ... when the government fears the people you have liberty." President Thomas Jefferson
  •  08-06-2008, 3:56 AM 2690 in reply to 2687

    SC- Helmet law seems a push against rallies

    http://www.myrtlebeachonline.com/news/local/story/543263.html

    FREEDOM OF CHOICE Helmet law seems a push against rallies By George Blumenthal @-I write in response to this newspaper's support of the proposed legislation mandating the use of helmets for motorcyclists. I neither support nor oppose the legislation. I have been a personal injury attorney since 1980; I have been a motorcycle rider since 1966. I have always worn a helmet, irrespective of whether there was a law mandating its use. I wear other protective clothing recommended by safety courses such as riding gloves, goggles, boots and protective jackets with body armor, also by choice.

    No one can argue against the proposition that wearing a helmet makes one safer. The same can be said for people who operate automobiles. Over the years I have represented numerous clients who have suffered closed head trauma and permanent brain injury as a result of relatively minor auto accidents. If the proposed law is truly about the state acting not in its ministerial governmental capacity but rather as our alter parent, then we should logically extend the requirement for safety helmets to drivers and occupants of all motor vehicles. It would probably be a good idea to include bicyclists and golf carts as well.

    As a second point, I would invite anyone concerned to visit a local motorcycle shop so that they may read the uniform government warning on the inside of every helmet. In short, the warning sticker makes clear that you should not expect protection of your head in major accidents. However, in moderate and minor mishaps it will provide good protection from head injury. In my personal judgment, that's enough reason for me to elect to wear one. If the expectation is that such a law will result in a statistical decrease in deaths due to motorcycle accidents, I believe you will be disappointed. More often than not, the cyclist dies as a result of multiple traumas, including trauma to vital internal organs and spinal cord.

    If Rep. Tracy Edge, R-North Myrtle Beach, [who intends to propose a helmet law] truly wants to protect motorcyclists, he should add to his efforts a bill to ban the use of cell phones while driving; a bill to make it unlawful to eat your meal from the front seat of your car while driving; a law that bans the reading of mail, newspapers, maps and other documents while driving, and encourage people to otherwise pay full time and attention to their driving. Most accidents involving motorcycles are caused by drivers who fail to yield right-of-way at intersections, often while they are distracted by the above.

    The fact that helmet legislation is once again a hot topic of discussion is suspicious on its face due to its timing. It appears retaliatory in nature and part of a do-anything-you-can movement to discourage bike rallies. It may well have that effect, but it will have the greatest impact on the permanent residents of our community who ride in South Carolina the remaining 50 weeks of the year. Que sera, sera.

    The writer lives in Murrells Inlet.


    Ride Free, Ride Often
    Bill C.

    "When the people fear the government you have tyranny ... when the government fears the people you have liberty." President Thomas Jefferson
Powered by Community Server, by Telligent Systems